Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

Four ages of understanding : the first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century / John Deely.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Toronto studies in semioticsPublisher: Toronto, [Ontario] ; Buffalo, [New York] ; London, [England] : University of Toronto Press, 2001Copyright date: ©2001Description: 1 online resource (1,054 pages) : illustrations, tablesContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781442675032 (e-book)
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Four ages of understanding : the first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century.DDC classification:
  • 190 21
LOC classification:
  • B72 .D445 2001
Online resources:
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Ebrary Online Books Ebrary Online Books Colombo Available CBEBK70002853
Ebrary Online Books Ebrary Online Books Jaffna Available JFEBK70002853
Ebrary Online Books Ebrary Online Books Kandy Available KDEBK70002853
Total holds: 0

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

The first full-scale demonstration of the centrality of the theory of signs to the history of philosophy, Four Ages of Understanding provides a new vantage point from which to review and reinterpret the development of intellectual culture at the threshold of "globalization".

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Description based on print version record.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2016. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.

Reviews provided by Syndetics

CHOICE Review

This massive study attempts to offer both an interpretive history of philosophy and an agenda for contemporary philosophy to follow. Deely (Univ. of St. Thomas, TX) focuses on four epochs: Greek antiquity, the Middle Ages, the modern period, and postmodernism. Yet the historical survey is also interpretive. Deely argues that the Middle Ages continued a discussion of the sign, which was begun in Greek antiquity. In the work of such writers as Poinsot, the classical notion of the sign is disassembled into a suprasubjective mode of being. Unfortunately, this work was forgotten with the onset of the modern period, which emphasized the sign's status as representation. It is only with postmodernism that this "road not taken" begins to be explored. Deely concludes with a discussion of Peirce and Eco. The book's shortcomings fall, perhaps, under the category of honesty in advertising--it is more a history of the understanding of the sign than it is a history of philosophy. The large claims about philosophy need to be tempered, since Peirce essentially is allowed to stand for all of postmodern thought! Nonetheless Deely's work merits serious study--it is scholarly, informative, and stimulating. S. Barnett Central Connecticut State University

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.