Four ages of understanding : the first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century / John Deely.
Material type:
- text
- computer
- online resource
- 9781442675032 (e-book)
- 190 21
- B72 .D445 2001
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Colombo | Available | CBEBK70002853 | ||||
![]() |
Jaffna | Available | JFEBK70002853 | ||||
![]() |
Kandy | Available | KDEBK70002853 |
Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:
The first full-scale demonstration of the centrality of the theory of signs to the history of philosophy, Four Ages of Understanding provides a new vantage point from which to review and reinterpret the development of intellectual culture at the threshold of "globalization".
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2016. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
Reviews provided by Syndetics
CHOICE Review
This massive study attempts to offer both an interpretive history of philosophy and an agenda for contemporary philosophy to follow. Deely (Univ. of St. Thomas, TX) focuses on four epochs: Greek antiquity, the Middle Ages, the modern period, and postmodernism. Yet the historical survey is also interpretive. Deely argues that the Middle Ages continued a discussion of the sign, which was begun in Greek antiquity. In the work of such writers as Poinsot, the classical notion of the sign is disassembled into a suprasubjective mode of being. Unfortunately, this work was forgotten with the onset of the modern period, which emphasized the sign's status as representation. It is only with postmodernism that this "road not taken" begins to be explored. Deely concludes with a discussion of Peirce and Eco. The book's shortcomings fall, perhaps, under the category of honesty in advertising--it is more a history of the understanding of the sign than it is a history of philosophy. The large claims about philosophy need to be tempered, since Peirce essentially is allowed to stand for all of postmodern thought! Nonetheless Deely's work merits serious study--it is scholarly, informative, and stimulating. S. Barnett Central Connecticut State UniversityThere are no comments on this title.