A cycle of outrage : America's reaction to the juvenile delinquent in the 1950s. / James Gilbert.

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

The youth culture is on everyone's lips today, as pressures build to ban controversial song lyrics, reintroduce school prayer, and prohibit teenagers' access to contraceptives. It's not the first time Americans have been outraged over the seuction of the innocent.. When James Dean and Marlon Brando donned their motorcycle jackets and adopted alienated poses in Rebel Without a Cause, East of Eden, and The Wild One, in the 1950's, so did countless numbers of American teenagers. Or so it seemed to their parents. American teenagers were looking and acting like juvenile delinquents. By mid-decade, the nation had reached a pitch of near obsession with the harmful effects of film, radio, comic books, and television on American youth. Experts across the land denounced mass culture as depriving young people of their innocence and weakening their parents' hold on them. By the end of the decade, the obsession had ended, although the actual numbers of juvenile delinquents had apparently risen. A Cycle of Outrage explores the 1950's debate over the media and juvenile delinquency among parents, professionals, and the creators of mass culture themselves. In this groundbreaking study, James Gilbert sees the attempt to blame the media as part of a larger reaction of discomfort echoed in recent debates over censorship. The book examines how the central phenomena of the 1950's--the development of youth culture and the rise of a mass media society--became intertwined and confused and argues that young people ceased to be a threat as they were recognized to be a market.

Reviews provided by Syndetics

CHOICE Review

Gilbert has written an excellent book about the 1950s. It covers the controversy surrounding the effect of comic books and other mass media on juvenile delinquency and is more readable than the many works of Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck concerning the same period. The bibliography is excellent, but the use of references from 1960 and later detracts from the effective use of period materials in most of the text. Gilbert also jumps from one period to another in his use of sources in a fashion that seems disjointed at times. Most of the material tells more about adults of the period than it does about the country's youth. Overall, the book is an excellent read. It is fun to review the period of one's youth and see how adults were thinking about the times and about the younger generation. General and undergraduate readership.-C.C. Vogler, SUNY College at Buffalo